ACMECTF

Competition => Cup => Topic started by: RUSTY``` on March 06, 2013, 04:29:26 PM



Title: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 06, 2013, 04:29:26 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------
EDITED 5/2  Finals results added.  league officials/servers section removed

League Champions: The Ooompa Loompas.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Rusty's Carpetsteaks:    Carrying Cartman:  
   Rusty(c)                            Targe+(c)
    Silk                                  roffles
    Zest                                 gamma
    Dash                               Cartman
                              
The Oompa Loompas:      Fors and the Substance Abusers:
     Alka                               Rust(c)
     Bonkers(c)                     Stan
     Link                                Fors
     Yowza                            Ex

                                
Regular season standings:
                                  wins   losses   ties   forfeit   caps   EnemyCaps
---The Oompa Loopas--:   7       2          x        x          50         30
---Substance abusers--:   6       3          1        x           59         30
---Carrying Cartman---:    3       5          1        1           33         51
-Rusty's Carpetstreaks-:   1       7          2        x          36        69



Regular Season:
 
TIME              SRVR   MAP      TEAMS      SCORE  
--------------------------------------------------------------

March 13                        
10:15-10:30 EST   1    q2ctf2    RC vs. CC   4-1
10:15-10:30 EST   2    q2ctf2    TOLvs. T4   ---    
                          
10:45-11pm EST    1    lfctf10   RC vs. T4    ---
10:45-11pm EST    2    lfctf10   CC vs. TOL  ---
--------------------------------------------------------------

March 20                        
10:15-10:30 EST   1    nxctf7    CC vs. T4   4-3
10:15-10:30 EST   2    nxctf7    RC vs. TOL  3-6    
                          
10:45-11pm EST    1    B6CTF     TOLvs. T4   6-3
10:45-11pm EST    2    B6CTF     RC vs. CC   12-13
--------------------------------------------------------------

March 27                        
10:15-10:30 EST   1    AS2M7     RC vs. TOL  1-9
10:15-10:30 EST   2    AS2M7     CC vs. T4   7-1    
                          
10:45-11pm EST    1    LFCTF1    RC vs. T4   2-2
10:45-11pm EST    2    LFCTF1    CC vs. TOL  ---
--------------------------------------------------------------

April 3                        
10:15-10:30 EST   1    NXCTF4b   RC vs. CC   4-3
10:15-10:30 EST   2    NXCTF4b   TOLvs. T4   7-8    
                          
10:45-11pm EST    1   XMAP07     RC vs. TOL 6-5
10:45-11pm EST    2   XMAP07     CC vs. T4  5-3
--------------------------------------------------------------

April 10                        
10:15-10:30 EST   1    LFCTF4    CC vs. TOL  3-2
10:15-10:30 EST   2    LFCTF4    RC vs. T4   1-11    
                          
10:45-11pm EST    1    *******   RC vs. CC   3-3
10:45-11pm EST    2    Q2CTF3B   TOLvs. T4   3-2
--------------------------------------------------------------

April 17                        
10:15-10:30 EST   1    AS2M7RB   RC vs. TOL  3-5
10:15-10:30 EST   2    AS2M7RB   CC vs. T4   1-8    
                          
10:45-11pm EST    1 MARICS_CTF21 CC vs. TOL  2-6
10:45-11pm EST    2 mARICS_CTF21 RC vs. T4   2-9
--------------------------------------------------------------

 -- PLAY-OFFS --  Seed1vSeed4 Seed2vSeed3 TOLvsRC  SAvsCC
April 24
10:20-10:35 EST 1   lfctf10         TOL vs. RC   9-5
10:35-10:50 EST 1   mactf06       TOL vs. RC  7-4

April 29:
10:20-10:35 EST 1   as2m7      SA Vs. CC   7-4
10:40-10:55 EST 1   nxctf7      SA vs. CC   6-2

---------------------------------------------------------------
May 1 ---Finals---

10:15-10:30 EST 1   lfctf10            TOL vs.SA   10-12
10:35-10:50 EST 1   marics_ctf21     TOL vs.SA   7-2
Tie-Breaker:
10:55-11:10 EST 1   b6ctf             TOL vs.SA   7-0

***************************************************************
Rules:

Matches will be 15 minutes long.  An automatic forfeit will be scored if a team is over twenty minutes late. Games will be 4v4 or 3v3.  If only one team is missing a player and a reasonable sub has not been found, the other team should sit a comparable player.

Subs must be approved by the opposing team's captain or by league officials.  Try to do this the day before.


absentee and unreliable players may be permanently replaced

In play-offs/finals a team can sit whomever they like if the opposing team does not have a full roster.  Expect it to be more difficult to have subs approved in finals/play-offs.

Lower seed picks color in play-offs.  higher seed picks map.  Any and all maps are allowed

Rescheduling of matches is only allowed in the play-offs and finals. Those games still must be played within the same calendar week.  Both teams must agree to reschedule or else game is expected to be wednesday night.

After matches, e-mail screenshots and demos to stmartinmj@gmail.com .  Demos needed if you'd like a chance to end up the star of a cast.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*****UPDATED PLAY-OFF RULES*****
High Seed: Pick any 3 maps by Saturday 4/20 post them on forum or pm me.
Low Seed: Pick any 2 maps by saturday 4/20 post them on forum or pm me.

Low seed: Order High seeds pick in preference(map1,map3,map5).
High Seed: Order low seeds maps in preference(map2,map4).

Best out of 3 determines winner.
round1: map1, 15 min, lower seed picks color
round2: map2, 15 min, higher seed picks color
**If each team won a game play round3**

round3: map3, 10 min, lower seed picks color
**If tie in caps then frags determine winner.  If tie in caps and frags play round4**

round4: map4,10 min, higher seed picks color
**If tie in caps then frags determine winner.  If tie in caps and frags play round5**

round5: map5, 10 min, lower seed picks color
**If tie in caps and frags in round 5 then first team to reach 7 captures on pong is the victor**

If both teams agree then the pong rule can be implemented in an earlier round.  Higher seed can make this decision unilaterally if made before round1 starts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Results will be posted here and in a weekly results thread.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 13, 2013, 11:22:31 PM
Looks like only a few people actually read the post above.  We won't be counting the results this week.  We only had 1 game tonight  RC versus CC.

A forfeit by Black Market versus The Oompa Loopmas.  Adrenaline apparently has/had no intention of playing in this league.  Nice of him to sign-up and screw his team just before the match.

The Oompa Loompas didn't seem to realize there were 2 matches with teams changing and seemed to mostly disappear after their forfeit win.  CC went to other server, unable to find TOL.   BM unfortunately still did not have enough for a game vs RC.

Please read the above schedule/format.   It has been posted like that since I first posted sign-ups well over a month ago.  If you have any feedback, give it now.  I have been open to feedback, but other than people wanting multiple nights a week there has been little or no feedback other than people complaining about the maps set to be played on irc A DAY BEFORE THE FIRST GAME.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Yoda on March 14, 2013, 02:51:39 AM
Aww I wish I could play. Have fun people!   8-)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on March 14, 2013, 05:08:00 AM
Yeah, adren can be a real wet diaper about this kinda shit, unfortunately.  But whatever, not everyone can be the kind of person needed for something like this.

It does suck on this not-showing-up issue, though.  Just me and rust were on.  Who knows where bad was.  At least Reefer had a legitimate excuse, he was swamped at work, working his ass off, which is fine.

I really felt sorry for Bonkers also, it sounded like he had the swine flu.   :lol:

What really sucked was since most everyone left, it eventually whittled down to just me & h0ps, which got annoying since he decided to do nothing but hide most the matches we were playing.  Talk about a pussy.  All he'd do every time he'd get hit is run and hide and make me chase him down.  What a little bitch. :roll:


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on March 14, 2013, 09:15:59 AM
Thank you to the members of Carry Cartman for showing up on time. We played a GG but were not prepared for a map with a PS :P

GGz

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 14, 2013, 12:26:15 PM
Sorry last week wasn't the success many were hoping for.   On the bright side we were able to weed out the absentee players.

3 players were removed from the league.   Alka has volunteered to become a full-time substitute player.  He could reasonable play in place of target,stan,rust,rusty, or bonkers.

Please look over your new teams.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on March 14, 2013, 12:56:22 PM
I will be in Toronto on 03/20 as I will be heading to Buffalo for the Lan the following day. Therefor I will need a sub (Alka?)

Thanks


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on March 14, 2013, 06:32:16 PM
work slowed back down dramatically again so if you need another full time player/sub, I can jump in.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on March 14, 2013, 08:53:19 PM
Hm, looking around at my team, other than Fors, we prolly need to rename to Substance Abuse.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 14, 2013, 09:21:06 PM
work slowed back down dramatically again so if you need another full time player/sub, I can jump in.

Thanks RICK, If you're free 3/20 your presence would be greatly appreciated.  Both Stan and Target will not be present that night.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 14, 2013, 09:24:56 PM
Marics_ctf2 was removed and replaced with base2.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 15, 2013, 10:37:51 AM
Base2 was a joke entry.  If anyone has a new suggestion that isn't along the lines of purge it can replace it, otherwise we'll do base2.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on March 15, 2013, 11:18:04 AM
Was Rampless on the list? That is becoming a popular map.

Marics has a few maps that people haven't traied that could be good. Ditto DR41G or whatever. I liked DGCTF2, but I think it would be too small for 4's.

Final Frontier (Q2CTF05B) was popular in Euroland, and I enjoy it. But most people get pissed at the way the doors work. However, if you are looking for "new" maps, there's one

Suma6 is another Euro fav, but quad/ps but I've come to find out that's too much for "modern" players.

The problems with maps like Dakyne & Samurai is that they are SOOOO big, that they become too big for a 4v4. Dakyne would be better, as someone can't solo hold the flag the whole map with doc (which could happen on Samurai if the player was a half decent grappler.

The only other map I can think of is Twin Towers Sinister (or whatever). The one with lava/slime around the YA.

WORM - Is there a list of all the available maps on the match servers? Or at least the main match server (I can always ask you to move maps to the other one :P)

I could join and go through the maps.

Talgo

PS There was a map on the ACME mod server that was started by Dr41G (I think) that had RA and Quad on 2 bridges in the middle. Below them was space (you fall, you die). The map had a bunch of Jump Pads in it. Might be a fun map to try if anyone know what map it is.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: WORM on March 15, 2013, 11:54:22 AM
Here's an updated match server maplist: http://www.acmectf.com/forum/index.php/topic,2363.msg54844.html#msg54844 (http://www.acmectf.com/forum/index.php/topic,2363.msg54844.html#msg54844)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on March 15, 2013, 12:32:04 PM
Base2 was a joke entry.  If anyone has a new suggestion that isn't along the lines of purge it can replace it, otherwise we'll do base2.

I have a few suggestions, since it's 4v4:
xmap07 - Sollar Pillars
mactf06 - Kiukku rules
beerctf3 - Neon Nexus
Either one of the Ride the Dragon maps.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on March 15, 2013, 04:24:12 PM
After watching an old OGL match on q2ctf5, I'd actually like to see that one added as I have not played a match on that map in well over 10 years.  Rampless would also be a good addition imo as jackass suggested. 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on March 15, 2013, 04:55:52 PM
Not to start an argument with my new bff but...

We have tried playing pickups on Q2CTF5 recently, and it turns into a chain fest. Everyone chains 100% of the time. There are too many bullets in base not to.

As someone who sucks with the chaingun, I have grown to hate that map.

my 2c

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on March 15, 2013, 05:45:55 PM
Not to start an argument with my new bff but...

We have tried playing pickups on Q2CTF5 recently, and it turns into a chain fest. Everyone chains 100% of the time. There are too many bullets in base not to.

As someone who sucks with the chaingun, I have grown to hate that map.

my 2c

Talgo

Then go "Golgo" and "balance" it, then upload the override for WORM to add to the rotation. 

The chain part is a good reason I like the map and always did as that's bout the only gun I consider myself good with. 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Reefer on March 16, 2013, 01:19:35 AM
I feel like an asshole but based on what happened last Wednesday I don't think I can commit to play in the cup.  I am new to my management position and as much as I want to get out of work to play, I don't feel like I can make the time on Wednesdays, and don't want to have you guys worrying about when I can't make it.  Really wanted to play, but the timing isn't right.  Sorry guys.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 16, 2013, 03:32:41 PM
NEW EDITS:

Reefer stepping down.  Alka and Link added back to the oompa loompas.   

Stan after being cast off yet another team has become a substance abuser.

I have a few suggestions, since it's 4v4:
xmap07 - Sollar Pillars

xmap07 has replaced base2. 

Hopefully this is the last need for an edit.



Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: stan on March 16, 2013, 05:15:52 PM
YES... Only downside is now I can ask where fors is going.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Fors on March 17, 2013, 12:25:02 AM
Wheeeere you going stanly? no really where :)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on March 17, 2013, 05:46:00 AM
Hm, looking around at my team, other than Fors, we prolly need to rename to Substance Abuse.

I concur. :laugh:

BTW, now that the rouge elements are removed, hopefully this will become a fun thing.  That was not fun at all dealing with 2 out of 5 showing up.  :<


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on March 17, 2013, 07:16:58 AM
jee, with stan and fors, can we be named Handicapped?

aka stacked, aka glurgonnal0ze


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on March 19, 2013, 07:19:17 AM
Naw, keep Substance Abuse.  There's too much shit flowing through my body at most moments, so Handicapped wouldn't make sense.  Same with Rust & stan also - yes, alcohol is a substance.   :wink:

BTW, stan isn't handicapped, it's just Fors that will be the issue.  :>    (<3 you Fors)

edit:  Can we possibly NOT have Rampless?  That map gets kind of annoying because people can hide too easily on it.

edit #2:  Can we also NOT play dual-quad maps as well?  Kinda turns into idiocy.  Single quad maps are okay because you can have everyone focused, but the dual-quad issue makes maps with 2 quads too random.  In case you're wondering, yes, I'm specifically saying that I do NOT want Neurotica (lfctf1) on the maplist.  It's a great map for pub play, but it makes the map chancey and open for random luck.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 19, 2013, 10:29:05 AM
i'm open to swapping it out.  Start another thread with a poll to see if people don't want to play it.

I always liked lfctf1, though it was more fun before power shield control became such an issue.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Fors on March 19, 2013, 01:15:07 PM
ex I know you have Dyslexia so I fixed this for you. Fors(<3 you ex) no big deal I will help you out when this happens, no need to thank me. :)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: stan on March 19, 2013, 06:28:43 PM
Just a reminder that tomorrow night I WILL need a sub as I am working midnights. I think rick mentioned he possible could?? Unless by some random chance we could play tonight, but I doubt that will happen.

If so give me a PM or have Fors give me a txt. I will probably be on tonight anyway.


-stanlaaay


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on March 19, 2013, 07:55:04 PM
Just a reminder that tomorrow night I WILL need a sub as I am working midnights. I think rick mentioned he possible could?? Unless by some random chance we could play tonight, but I doubt that will happen.

If so give me a PM or have Fors give me a txt. I will probably be on tonight anyway.


-stanlaaay

I'll be around if I'm needed.  Only played once or twice the past month, month and a half so I will be pretty bad.  Fair warning to whatever team I'm subbing for 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on March 20, 2013, 03:25:29 AM
Just a reminder that tomorrow night I WILL need a sub as I am working midnights. I think rick mentioned he possible could?? Unless by some random chance we could play tonight, but I doubt that will happen.

If so give me a PM or have Fors give me a txt. I will probably be on tonight anyway.


-stanlaaay

I'll be around if I'm needed.  Only played once or twice the past month, month and a half so I will be pretty bad.  Fair warning to whatever team I'm subbing for 

It's okay, you'll be on our team which is crappy anyway.  Team crappy ftw!


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 20, 2013, 10:32:25 AM
Neoxotb with be carrying cartman tonight playing with barton,gamma, and cartman

roffles will be a substance abuser. playing with rust, fors, and ex. 

games start 10:15pm EST    try to be on at 10.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on March 20, 2013, 03:41:11 PM
So close to the dream team  :wink:

Thank Neox


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on March 21, 2013, 12:14:55 AM
Looked like some pretty good and close games tonight Rusty, thanks for setting it up.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: yowza on March 21, 2013, 09:22:03 AM
Looked like some pretty good and close games tonight Rusty, thanks for setting it up.
Ditto. Thanks Rusty.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: neoxotb on March 21, 2013, 10:35:17 AM
So close to the dream team  :wink:

Thank Neox

I played okay first game. Outpost was just a wonky time that totally messed up my rhythm.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on March 21, 2013, 05:57:18 PM
I thought I was depressed about losing both games until I saw the landslide that happened with neo and rick both on one team. :lol:


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on March 21, 2013, 06:55:12 PM
Depressed? Game 1 we were without our best player and they picked up one of the best in the community :)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 22, 2013, 11:04:06 AM
Sorry for the delayed results updated.

An exciting night of gaming for week 2.   The Oompa Loompas and Carrying Cartman came out victoriously(without target,barton, and without even cartman for 1.5 games)

The Oompa Loomps were able to do it without the use of subs.   After the rather goofy decision of allowing Rick to Sub on Carrying Cartman in addition to Neox, they agreed to play a second match which had opposite results.   scores will be combined.

Matches:
The Oompa Loomps Beat Rusty's CarpetSteaks 6 to 3.

Carrying Cartman Beat Fors and the Substance Abusers 4 to 3.

The Oompa Loomps Beat Fors and the Substance Abusers 6 to 3

Carrying Cartman in two matches beats Rusty's CarpetSteaks 13 to 12


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on March 22, 2013, 11:35:44 AM
Things I learned from the first successful week of matches:

I have lost my rail. I chained more in 2 maps than I did in the past 10 years.

I love my team. (including link even though he eats dinner at 2pm and goes to sleep before 9pm, is he 84 yrs old?)

The Oompa Loompas are very consistent with ending scores of 6-3 for both maps. I think we will try to make every future match end in a 6-3 score.

Rusty is very much a part of his cup, making sure everyone knows where to go, which map to play, and which teams are playing each other. (I think he was sober the other night, if he is drinking on upcoming Wednesday night matches I may edit this post.)

Original players are made to sit while subs play. This almost happened with our first match and after seeing screenshots I see Cartman sitting spec in a 4v4. If there are no subs available and someone needs to sit to make it 3v3 I can understand this. But to use 3 subs on a team when a player from the original team sits spec is madness.

Maybe more will show up next week and we can have some full, original teams playing against each other.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: xgamma on March 22, 2013, 12:24:47 PM
Cartman was spec because he showed up halfway through the first match on b6ctf, hence why he wasn't playing and why we played a second map with Cartman in.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on March 22, 2013, 12:38:09 PM
Thanks for clarifying.
Now that's out of the way.
Cartman, you need to get a little more serious!


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 22, 2013, 01:57:08 PM
the rc vs cc screenshots were posted in the wrong order.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on March 22, 2013, 05:32:51 PM
Depressed? Game 1 we were without our best player and they picked up one of the best in the community :)

Yeah, actually seeing that, we didn't do too bad.  Wish I coulda held down D better, tho.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: stan on March 23, 2013, 09:26:29 AM
Dont worry fellas, it's understandable.. I wasn't there to keep Fors in line, that SOB.

Rust did you not have enough drinks before the match?
Freak did you not flag stand enough?


We'll get'em this wed.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on March 23, 2013, 11:49:22 AM
told me to be here so that I could sub then promptly kick me off the team and do a rematch heh...make up your mind next time so I don't waste my time trying to make it here to be a sub just so that I can sit the first map then play the second to only get booted off to have a rematch and not even get a thank you for showing up(which isn't something I want).  I just didn't understand it as I was asked to be here, then when I got to play, it was an issue.  /shrug, let me know if you need me for the next one I guess


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on March 23, 2013, 12:00:40 PM
i drank plenty.

rick, thx for being a trooper


Title: Week 3 results
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 27, 2013, 11:45:59 PM
The Good:
3 games played today.   

2v2 Carrying Cartman(Target,Cartman) was no match for Fors and one substance abuser(fors,rust).  score 7 to 1

3v3 The Oompa Loompas(alka,Link,Yowza dominated Rusty's Carpetstreaks(Rusty,Silk,----) 9 to 1.

Very close tie game 2 to 2 in a 3v3 Fors and the substance abusers(fors,rust,ben+jerry as sub) against Rusty's Carpetstreaks(Rusty,Silk,----)

The Bad:
Carrying Cartman forfietted match 2 vs The oompa loompass due to attendence.

Several no-shows without prior notice.  Games are the same time each week.  It's not that hard to let people know in advance if you won't be even to make it or even if you're attendance isn't perfect.

Windows8 players are having anticheat issues.  Not sure why, but a player who could connect last week on matchserver2, this week couldn't connect to the games on kickass match.

I may be replacing a a player in the next few days based on 2 weeks of no contact.

I forgot to take a screenshot from TOL RC match. If someone could post it, it would be appreciated.




Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on March 28, 2013, 01:57:33 AM
Well with a funeral, lots of drinking, and just fucking busy as shit with the last week, I completely forgot I had a match tonight.  Got done with my math homework and I realized what day it was.   :lol:  Man oh man...

Usually this doesn't happen to me, I tend to stay on my biz.  :/  Sorry to all that I wasn't here, my mistake.  I WILL be here for sure from here on out, will set reminders and alarms, mark days on calendar, pay a man to slap me on Wednesday afternoons until May, etc. etc.   :-D

edit:  As a plus, I did avoid playing on lfctf1 after all.   :laugh:


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on March 29, 2013, 04:35:44 PM
screenshots week3


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 04, 2013, 12:23:55 AM
Week4 Results:

Some very good games this week.

Fors and the Substance came out on top this week with 2 victories bringing the first defeat of the season for The Oompa Loompas.  The Oompa Loompas edged a victory over Rusty's Carpetstreaks who in turn had a close game with Carrying Cartman.  Hopefully future weeks hold better results for Carrying Cartman.

After 3 weeks of not appearing Barton is officially being dropped from the league.  Anyone interested in filling his shoes please send me a pm.  Hopefully we find someone of comparative caliber to replace him.



Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 04, 2013, 12:37:23 AM
Week4 stats: DM only



Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Barton on April 04, 2013, 10:56:52 AM
Wednesday has not been a good day for me lately. I'm either busy or I keep forgetting that this cup exists. My bad y'all. :x


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: yowza on April 04, 2013, 11:02:59 AM
Hey Rusty - Thank you for all the work with the Cup!


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 04, 2013, 08:33:03 PM
Hey Rusty - Thank you for all the work with the Cup!

In the phrasing of Yoda: Thanking you, I feel I should be.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 05, 2013, 10:12:07 AM
I would like everyone to welcome and Thank RICK for stepping up and volunteering to replace Barton on Carrying Cartman.  Teams have been edited in the OP.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: WORM on April 05, 2013, 10:13:17 AM
Welcome and thank you rick.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 05, 2013, 10:35:40 AM
time to shoot at target only and do my best to piss him off on game night  :angel:


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 05, 2013, 10:37:03 AM
time to shoot at target only and do my best to piss him off on game night  :angel:

For Cartman's sake.  Please don't prove wormbot right ;)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Reefer on April 05, 2013, 07:16:31 PM
Wormbot still hasn't responded to my challenge on the 1v1 ladder.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 05, 2013, 08:20:48 PM
wt!? CC is now a favorite.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 05, 2013, 09:24:23 PM
wt!? CC is now a favorite.

That's a joke, right?  Barton is better than me by far IMO. 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 09, 2013, 11:14:23 AM
wt!? CC is now a favorite.

try playing sober?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 11, 2013, 05:56:40 PM
ggs last night.  I just watched both the demos I had and I wanted to apologize to gamma for leaving him alone to fend for him self so much on D verse the whole other team haha.  And that's why you outscored me every map is you racked up the extra defense points while I played outter :P. (excuse)

and sorry for chaining you so much the second game rusty haha.  I was an asshole that whole game.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on April 11, 2013, 06:09:02 PM
you got 98% of the quads. i bet barton would have gotten 100% of them, but i'm glad you were able to try and fill his shoes and play last night.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 11, 2013, 06:43:39 PM
Some good games last night.  A majority of the teams were winners!

 There was an unfortunate deviation from rules using servers lacking maps last night due to a player having some odd issues connecting, but the games were intense none the less.

TOL still leading the league has turned average this week with a win and a loss.  Carrying Cartman with the addition of a new player who is not as good as Barton managed to pull an upset, beating the champs 3 to 2.  The Oompa Loomps edged a 3-2 victory against Fors and his drunken teammates evening things out from last week.

Substance Abusers demolished Rusty's Carpetstreaks 11 to 1 on lfctf4 with devastating screenshot below that would only excite the likes of ex.

The underdog and his poop stains managed a degree of redemption however by managing a 3-3 tie with the very team that beat the league leaders.

Standings to date:
Standings:
                                  wins   losses   ties   forfeit   caps   EnemyCaps
---The Oompa Loopas--:   5       2          x        x          39         25
---Substance abusers--:   4       3          1        x           42         27
---Carrying Cartman---:    3       3          1        1           30         37
-Rusty's Carpetstreaks-:   1       5          2        x          31        55

If issues with connections/servers/maps occur again a like map only may be played if both teams agree.  for next week that would be as2m7 for as2m7rb and rtctf1a for marics_ctf21 only.  This week the cc-rc game was a bit of a bastardization of the rules.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 11, 2013, 09:35:18 PM
lol alka, fu.  I only got about 60% of them cuz you guys were raping me 3on1 most of the time pretty hard at quad haha.  And I mis-timed quad like 5th or 6th spawn and after that, you guys had it locked pretty good cuz I couldn't recover too well with YOWZA kicking my ass everytime I turned around :D

For humor purposes, I'll upload my POV from that map in case anyone wants to see how bad I suck, minus the one cap I got which was pretty sexy haha.  Was one of the best matches I've played in a long time, even better then any ra2 match I've played in the past few years, you guys kept things close and intense.  gg for sure.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 11, 2013, 09:55:51 PM
poorly done dm stats.    my quake crashed against cc so there are no stats for that game.  ty to rust for the demos.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: xgamma on April 11, 2013, 11:16:18 PM
how do you generate the DM stats?  i can send you a demo if that helps, although it has the extra map on it as well.

Your CC vs SA stats also are RC vs SA


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on April 12, 2013, 05:58:52 AM
Substance Abusers demolished Rusty's Carpetstreaks 11 to 1 on lfctf4 with devastating screenshot below that would only excite the likes of ex.

LOL wtf did I do?  I already knew you were having issues with your team man, I was just chillin bs'in in base once we were up by so much.  I was hoping you wouldn't think bad on SA (or me) for that match.  :<  The main problem is your team wasn't on vent, not a single person.  It's too hard when the other team has 4 members all on vent.

You still gave me a run for my moneymaker.  :>


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 12, 2013, 10:02:42 AM
Substance Abusers demolished Rusty's Carpetstreaks 11 to 1 on lfctf4 with devastating screenshot below that would only excite the likes of ex.

LOL wtf did I do?  I already knew you were having issues with your team man, I was just chillin bs'in in base once we were up by so much.  I was hoping you wouldn't think bad on SA (or me) for that match.  :<  The main problem is your team wasn't on vent, not a single person.  It's too hard when the other team has 4 members all on vent.

You still gave me a run for my moneymaker.  :>

I was just razzing you :P , Honestly you did a great job standing on the flag :)

we were on comm, for some reason the lm players like teamspeak so we used that.  I personally don't understand having preferences on stuff like that.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 12, 2013, 10:07:50 AM
how do you generate the DM stats?  i can send you a demo if that helps, although it has the extra map on it as well.

Your CC vs SA stats also are RC vs SA


http://www.gamers.org/pub/idgames2/planetquake/idda/ (http://www.gamers.org/pub/idgames2/planetquake/idda/) is what i use.

if you email me stmartinmj@gmail.com I'll post more dm stats for a ctf game.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: WORM on April 12, 2013, 10:52:10 AM
There was an unfortunate deviation from rules using servers lacking maps last night due to a player having some odd issues connecting, but the games were intense none the less

The problem with your team member not connecting would have been easily and quickly fixed with him rebooting his computer. The issue is well known and not confined to our servers only. A search of forum, or remembering what I told you in IRC some time ago, would have shown the solution. I have had the same problem and a quick reboot solved the problem.

The main problem is your team wasn't on vent, not a single person.  It's too hard when the other team has 4 members all on vent.

A very valid point.

we were on comm, for some reason the lm players like teamspeak so we used that.  I personally don't understand having preferences on stuff like that.

I fail to understand why you let one or two players decide that to the detriment of others on your team and other teams playing in the competition.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 12, 2013, 11:39:55 AM
reboot was tried, anticheat.dll was deleted, and match was supposed to have started which made a more lengthy troubleshoot out of the question if we wanted to play. opposing teams had option to continue as a 3v3 on acme.  I can't control these things.

Why does a teams voice comm method matter? 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: cata1yst on April 12, 2013, 12:04:02 PM
having a pref for  voice comms, hmm.

Well Steam is a steaming pile of shit for that, Vent gets the job done, but for the best voice quality, lowest latency / delay, and better voice detection (instead of using PTT, or picking up insane background noise), TeamSpeak is the clear choice.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on April 12, 2013, 12:17:32 PM
actually Mumble is my preference for comms but the majority of community prefer Ventrilo for whatever reasons, including it's what they have always used and are used to, so that's what I support.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: WORM on April 12, 2013, 10:58:04 PM
Why does a teams voice comm method matter? 

It's not about the team...it's about the competition as a whole. Both teams being on same voice comm service allows easier coordination and communication between teams setting up for the game and any issues that may arise can be addressed quickly and easily between teams. Both teams being on the same voice comm shows compliance with normal competition rules...no other players on team channels except team members so no challenges as to "ghosting" or other so-called cheats occuring during competition. Each team can easily see this is transparent and everything is above board and beyond reproach for both sides.

As far as method of communication choice? I personally prefer mumble as the best quality and least latency...we provide a Mumble server for all players. Second, I would pick Teamspeak3. As the majority of players prefer Ventrilo it has become the de facto standard for AcmeCTF and we have a Ventrilo server available for use on our game servers.

I would gladly set up Teamspeak3 for use if that is what everyone wanted. But it has not been the case. So why should one or two players that do not even play on our servers except for being on one team in this cup determine what is used???!!! Sorry, that is beyond belief. Same with the variation in maps due to one player.......it is completely unfair to other teams in this cup.

Now...may I get back to my Friday night martinis? tyvm


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 12, 2013, 11:14:19 PM
I'm not partial to any particular voice comm -- I'm a follower!

In terms of letting one player determine the server, to RUSTYs point, he gave us (me) the option to 3v3, 4v4 w/ sub, or 4v4 on tasty. While my (our) allegiance is to acme, I really wanted ex to ping 20 so he could actually do something. Ha, ha, ha. More importantly, I just wanted everyone to be able to play and saw no real downside. It had our scheduled map, if it didn't, I probably would have offered tasty but we got to choose map color. Actually, I'da probably flipped for it...I like attacking blue :)

Ditto Fri-tini's. Holla.

-roost.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 13, 2013, 11:22:05 AM
Please keep in mind that if it wasn't for these two players that don't even play on ACME's pub there wouldn't have been enough sign-ups for 4 teams.  I'm not sorry for asking compromise from all in order to accommodate all.  I have not forced matchtime compromise on anyone.

I still fail to see the big problem with not being on vent.  Even on vent i generally talk with the other team in the game chat.  Any fear of comm ghosting/cheating I hope would be none just after looking at the first player on each team.  I find that criticism insulting.   The teams are lead by reasonable individuals who can start matches and make needed compromises without me.  Matches don't need a constant overseer.  It would be one thing if a player actually said to me they wish I was on vent last night so they could have jumped in my channel because they had an actual issues, but this theoretical criticism is a bit much.  This is supposed to be an update/standings thread.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: WORM on April 13, 2013, 04:35:19 PM
It would be one thing if a player actually said to me they wish I was on vent last night so they could have jumped in my channel because they had an actual issues, but this theoretical criticism is a bit much.

Pardon me...I thought that was what this was:

....The main problem is your team wasn't on vent, not a single person.  It's too hard when the other team has 4 members all on vent.

Looking back, I see where your cup rules do not even address voice comm or many other issues so I guess it's a moot point. However, I do see where ex's comment is valid.

No insult intended, Rusty. I just call 'em as I see 'em and if you will notice I did not say anything until after ex posted. And this thread had gone way beyond being "an update/standings thread" long before I posted.

Stop getting your panties in a wad because I voice an opinion.  Crying "insult" every other breath is...well....insulting. :-P


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: NQK Ramirez on April 13, 2013, 04:53:27 PM
Let's settle this insulting business with a Duel. 

mano a mano

Rusty V Worm

To make it fair, the duel should Be on Golgo's server.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 13, 2013, 06:58:20 PM

Pardon me...I thought that was what this was:

....The main problem is your team wasn't on vent, not a single person.  It's too hard when the other team has 4 members all on vent.


To me, this is ex giving his reason why Rusty's team lost so bad to Rust's (/ex's) team. Rusty's team lost 11-1. IMO, ex is saying they would have done better if they were using voice communication not realizing that Rusty's team was on Teamspeak.

I for one am very happy that Silk & Zest were able to join this tournament. Let's not forget that if they didn't sign up, we wouldn't have had enough players.

In terms of letting one player determine the server, to RUSTYs point, he gave us (me) the option to 3v3, 4v4 w/ sub, or 4v4 on tasty (...)  More importantly, I just wanted everyone to be able to play and saw no real downside. It had our scheduled map, if it didn't, I probably would have offered tasty but we got to choose map color. Actually, I'da probably flipped for it...I like attacking blue :)


As the other captain to have played Rusty's team, this was my sentiments as well. I would much rather have everyone play then play 3v3 or try looking for a sub when that player is available. Hopefully Silk will learn from this lesson and try to be on earlier (that day or throughout the week) making sure he can get on the server. Also, keep in mind that my ping went from ~90 on ACME to ~120 on TS.

Good games have been had so far in this cup and IMO, the purpose is fun. I think anyone "ghosting" in a fun cup would be promptly removed from the cup. However, I would not allow anyone on my team to "ghost" and I trust the other 3 captains enough to know they wouldn't allow it either.

My 2c :-/

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on April 14, 2013, 06:30:19 AM
Ok, actually didn't realize the other people were on another voice server.  What that comes down to then, knowing that, is just a skill stack.  stan is pretty powerful on O, hard to deal with because rust, Fors, and me are all in general decent mid-strength players who can all handle roaming/D effectively.  I think IIRC rust did take on some of the O that game as well tho.  :>

BTW, not sure what the big to-do is about the whole "everyone on one voice server" thing...to me, the most important part is having YOUR team all on one voice server communicating with each other.  The other thing about having everyone on one server is less important, as coordination can be done very easily with messagemode in-game.

Not sure how the conversation steered in this direction, actually.  My original issue was that I thought none of RUSTY's team was on with him.  Now I realize the issue was really just a skill stack.  It's mainly due to Zest and Silk.  IIRC those are both railwarz players, and it's hard to make the transition from RWZ to regular CTF (harder IMO than going from reg CTF to RWZ).  Dash is decent, it's just that our team is actually pretty powerful.  Me, stan, and Fors always play together fairly well also.  Rust can be a lil bitch at times but in general he's cool too. :laugh:

Anyway, hope that smooths out any (or may have added more) dings in the hood of this thread.  :>


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 14, 2013, 09:14:53 AM
whatchoo talkin bout, willis?

play the game, drink a beer and smile. nutnelsegg.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 14, 2013, 05:38:21 PM
(1) stan is pretty powerful on O, hard to deal with because rust, Fors, and (2) me are all in general decent mid-strength players who can all handle roaming/D effectively.

(3) It's mainly due to Zest and Silk.  IIRC those are both railwarz players, and it's hard to make the transition from RWZ to regular CTF (harder IMO than going from reg CTF to RWZ).  (4) Dash is decent.


Couple things to go over since someone shot himself up before getting on the forums and is a complete fucking idiot.

(1) stan sucks, bad.  Enough said. (<3)

(2) You're decent?  Since when?  We lost a 2on3 the other night because you're fucking horrible.  Enough said.

(3) Zest and Silk are LMCTF players, not railwarz.  And they also did very very well against us(Carrying Cartman) after we beat alkas team, and actually tied the game with us when I thought it would be more of a blowout since Zest and Silk aren't really LFire players.  That made no difference really because Zest is very good(aim wise), and Silk is also, just not so good at grappling(yet).

(4) Dash is very good IMO, not "decent".  He is actually one of the better grapplers in this Cup you crackhead.  Miles and miles better then stanley motherfucking james ( :(! , <3 stan and <3 kt x A million)

(5) You're a fatass.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: stan on April 14, 2013, 09:04:00 PM
In the kind words of the late KillerT, FKN {PLEASE} ricky ross.
NoobT would be rollin over in his grave right now if he was reading your post you sob.  :wink:

I gotta give it to Fors and ex. The last two cup nights I have played with them they really held it down in mid / D. Freak is a decent player when he wants to be, and he's done a great job communicating on vent and has hit some pretty clutch shots.  Fors has been hitting some pretty nasty rails as well, which is shocking because I usually have to get on his ass to actually do something.  8-)

Rust on the other hand is too busy making drinks / sandwiches  in the kitchen to help me out on O... (jk buddy, <3). Actually I think rust did about 90% of the caps on our last two matches which is surprising because he and I were on the same team last cup and he played strictly D. Didn't know you had it in you ;).


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: BoNkErS on April 14, 2013, 09:28:54 PM
In the kind words of the late KillerT, FKN {PLEASE} ricky ross.
NoobT would be rollin over in his grave right now if he was reading your post you sob.  :wink:

I gotta give it to Fors and ex. The last two cup nights I have played with them they really held it down in mid / D. Freak is a decent player when he wants to be, and he's done a great job communicating on vent and has hit some pretty clutch shots.  Fors has been hitting some pretty nasty rails as well, which is shocking because I usually have to get on his ass to actually do something.  8-)

Rust on the other hand is too busy making drinks / sandwiches  in the kitchen to help me out on O... (jk buddy, <3). Actually I think rust did about 90% of the caps on our last two matches which is surprising because he and I were on the same team last cup and he played strictly D. Didn't know you had it in you ;).

Rust has lots of things in him- they're usually attached to some else though. <3


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 14, 2013, 09:39:05 PM
wha whaa?

wheres the beer?

POLL: Whos an organ donor?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: BoNkErS on April 14, 2013, 10:29:40 PM
wha whaa?

wheres the beer?

POLL: Whos an organ donor?

You requesting someone else's organ????

Ilu rust


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: NQK Ramirez on April 14, 2013, 11:38:19 PM
(1) stan is pretty powerful on O, hard to deal with because rust, Fors, and (2) me are all in general decent mid-strength players who can all handle roaming/D effectively.

(3) It's mainly due to Zest and Silk.  IIRC those are both railwarz players, and it's hard to make the transition from RWZ to regular CTF (harder IMO than going from reg CTF to RWZ).  (4) Dash is decent.


(1) stan sucks, bad.  Enough said. (<3)

(2) You're decent?  Since when?  We lost a 2on3 the other night because you're fucking horrible.  Enough said.


(4) Dash is very good IMO, not "decent".  He is actually one of the better grapplers in this Cup you crackhead.  Miles and miles better then stanley motherfucking james ( :(! , <3 stan and <3 kt x A million)

(5) You're a fatass.





Preposterous! Blasphemy!  Stan over Dash any day of the week. Without a shadow of a doubt.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 15, 2013, 08:50:04 PM

Rust on the other hand is too busy making drinks / sandwiches  in the kitchen to help me out on O... (jk buddy, <3). Actually I think rust did about 90% of the caps on our last two matches which is surprising because he and I were on the same team last cup and he played strictly D. Didn't know you had it in you ;).

Hm, how quickly ppl forget! In the first round of q2ctf/q3ctf I exclusively played offense. When I came back the general grapple proficiency / strafe jumping had improved 200% so i was relegated to holding T!'s pants up on D while he killed everyone in the first cup. So, I like playing both, and ur ok to play o with :). I agree too, fors and ex are playing really well, thats been great. If we could get 4 of us sober one night we'll be a force to reckon with...


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on April 15, 2013, 09:13:24 PM
my team, [ToL], has decided to turn our monitors on for this weeks matches.. bring the pain.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 15, 2013, 09:38:08 PM
Gamma advised me that he will likely be unable to play Wednesday's match. Is there anyone who could/would fill in for him?

Thanks!


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 15, 2013, 10:50:01 PM
Gamma advised me that he will likely be unable to play Wednesday's match. Is there anyone who could/would fill in for him?

Thanks!

I would, but I'm already on a team.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on April 16, 2013, 01:49:44 AM
I agree too, fors and ex are playing really well, thats been great. If we could get 4 of us sober one night we'll be a force to reckon with...

Just so it's known, I am sober every time I'm playing a cup match.  I'm tired of playing shitty due to being fucked up on anything, legal or otherwise.  Usually once the match is done, the beers start flowing.  :>

BTW:

Couple things to go over since someone shot himself up before getting on the forums and is a complete fucking idiot.

Back on the drag again, huh?  Guess your Suboxone ran out.   :roll:


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: yowza on April 16, 2013, 03:24:20 PM
my team, [ToL], has decided to turn our monitors on for this weeks matches.. bring the pain.
I played like mine was off. I will layoff the Wild Turkey for the next one which will help in many ways.  :-D


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Link on April 17, 2013, 01:19:53 AM
my team, [ToL], has decided to turn our monitors on for this weeks matches.. bring the pain.

A monitor, what's that?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: yowza on April 17, 2013, 07:43:15 AM
my team, [ToL], has decided to turn our monitors on for this weeks matches.. bring the pain.

A monitor, what's that?
Hey Link - I am your 1st applaud to the left there <<< !


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 17, 2013, 11:36:35 AM
Gamma advised me that he will likely be unable to play Wednesday's match. Is there anyone who could/would fill in for him?

Thanks!


Still looking for for someone. I figure most people who come to the forums are already in the cup, but /shrug.

I checked the stats page (http://acmectf.com/acme/stats/player/ (http://acmectf.com/acme/stats/player/)) and gamma was 63rd. stab was 64th, so....stab wanna play for CC tonight? :P

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 17, 2013, 11:37:24 AM
Gamma advised me that he will likely be unable to play Wednesday's match. Is there anyone who could/would fill in for him?

Thanks!


Still looking for for someone. I figure most people who come to the forums are already in the cup, but /shrug.

I checked the stats page ([url]http://acmectf.com/acme/stats/player/[/url] ([url]http://acmectf.com/acme/stats/player/[/url])) and gamma was 63rd. stab was 64th, so....stab wanna play for CC tonight? :P

Talgo


I thought setherial could play?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 17, 2013, 11:39:32 AM
I thought setherial could play?

My PM said I had asked Seth, but she told me that she doesn't typically get home till 10:30 and still has to eat/shower/whatever else chicks do after work.

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: T! on April 17, 2013, 02:08:47 PM
Gamma advised me that he will likely be unable to play Wednesday's match. Is there anyone who could/would fill in for him?

Thanks!


Still looking for for someone. I figure most people who come to the forums are already in the cup, but /shrug.

I checked the stats page ([url]http://acmectf.com/acme/stats/player/[/url] ([url]http://acmectf.com/acme/stats/player/[/url])) and gamma was 63rd. stab was 64th, so....stab wanna play for CC tonight? :P

Talgo


Ok. What time is our match?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: T! on April 17, 2013, 02:14:03 PM

Rust on the other hand is too busy making drinks / sandwiches  in the kitchen to help me out on O... (jk buddy, <3). Actually I think rust did about 90% of the caps on our last two matches which is surprising because he and I were on the same team last cup and he played strictly D. Didn't know you had it in you ;).

Hm, how quickly ppl forget! In the first round of q2ctf/q3ctf I exclusively played offense. When I came back the general grapple proficiency / strafe jumping had improved 200% so i was relegated to holding T!'s pants up on D while he killed everyone in the first cup. So, I like playing both, and ur ok to play o with :). I agree too, fors and ex are playing really well, thats been great. If we could get 4 of us sober one night we'll be a force to reckon with...

Not true. I wasn't wearing any pants on D. It distracts the enemy offensive players.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: BoNkErS on April 17, 2013, 02:16:31 PM

Rust on the other hand is too busy making drinks / sandwiches  in the kitchen to help me out on O... (jk buddy, <3). Actually I think rust did about 90% of the caps on our last two matches which is surprising because he and I were on the same team last cup and he played strictly D. Didn't know you had it in you ;).

Hm, how quickly ppl forget! In the first round of q2ctf/q3ctf I exclusively played offense. When I came back the general grapple proficiency / strafe jumping had improved 200% so i was relegated to holding T!'s pants up on D while he killed everyone in the first cup. So, I like playing both, and ur ok to play o with :). I agree too, fors and ex are playing really well, thats been great. If we could get 4 of us sober one night we'll be a force to reckon with...

Not true. I wasn't wearing any pants on D. It distracts the enemy offensive players.

Definitely distracts me when you don't wear pants... Giggity!


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 17, 2013, 02:31:03 PM
Ok. What time is our match?

10:15 EST


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 17, 2013, 07:26:29 PM
T! can only sub if he does one of the following:

a. keyboard only

b. 3 button mouse only, no keyboard.  forward,shoot,weapon change, jump only(similar to what alka does except with a mouse)

c. use a touchpad with a keyboard


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: T! on April 17, 2013, 08:38:31 PM
T! can only sub if he does one of the following:

a. keyboard only

b. 3 button mouse only, no keyboard.  forward,shoot,weapon change, jump only(similar to what alka does except with a mouse)

c. use a touchpad with a keyboard

I'll do all 3. See you guys tonight!


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 17, 2013, 08:42:44 PM
Please come hang out tonight, no way ur subbing tho, you sloot :)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 18, 2013, 01:36:38 PM
Had a good night of games last night.  The overall attendance the last few weeks has been excellent.  The Oompa Loompas and the Substance Abusers Came out victorious with two wins each.   The carpetstreaks put up a good fight against TOL until the last third of the game when things began going downhill.  The Substance abusers have truly shown themselves to be a force last night with two easy victories-- rumor has it a few of them are playing sober which I don't think anybody could have expected.  Despite the new and improved Carrying Cartman beating the league leaders last week, the absence of gamma this took a toll on the team resulting in two losses.

Last night:

sa 9  rc 2
tol 5 rc 3
sa 8 cc 1
tol 6 cc 2

Standings:
                                  wins   losses   ties   forfeit   caps   EnemyCaps
---The Oompa Loopas--:   7       2          x        x          50         30
---Substance abusers--:   6       3          1        x           59         30
---Carrying Cartman---:    3       5          1        1           33         51
-Rusty's Carpetstreaks-:   1       7          2        x          36        69


Next week is the play-offs.   Make sure in advance all your players are available.  Ideally games will be played normal time next wednesday, but rescheduling IS exceptable if both teams agree PRIOR TO WEDNESDAY and the game is played within the calendar week.

Good luck getting subs approved by the opposing captain.  We have reached the play-offs.  Don't expect charity.  Things are serious now.


Newly modified play-off format(any alterations require a decree from Fors):

High Seed: Pick any 3 maps by Saturday 4/20 post them on forum or pm me.
Low Seed: Pick any 2 maps by saturday 4/20 post them on forum or pm me.

Low seed: Order High seeds pick in preference(map1,map3,map5).
High Seed: Order low seeds maps in preference(map2,map4).

Best out of 3 determines winner.
round1: map1, 15 min, lower seed picks color
round2: map2, 15 min, higher seed picks color
**If each team won a game play round3**

round3: map3, 10 min, lower seed picks color
**If tie in caps then frags determine winner.  If tie in caps and frags play round4**

round4: map4,10 min, higher seed picks color
**If tie in caps then frags determine winner.  If tie in caps and frags play round5**

round5: map5, 10 min, lower seed picks color
**If tie in caps and frags in round 5 then first team to reach 7 captures on pong is the victor**

Good luck to all.  If both teams agree then the pong rule can be implemented in an earlier round.  Higher seed can make this decision unilaterally if made before round1 starts.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 18, 2013, 01:45:15 PM
stats


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: xgamma on April 18, 2013, 03:05:13 PM
8-1? 6-2? WAT?

why were we down a player both games? :(


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 18, 2013, 03:52:57 PM
The games were lollipops and sunshine.

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: stan on April 18, 2013, 06:46:01 PM
The Substance abusers have truly shown themselves to be a force last night with two easy victories-- rumor has it a few of them are playing sober which I don't think anybody could have expected.

Haha Rusty I'm sure if you would have scheduled this CUP for matches to played on the weekends, things would be a little different.
However, we have been holding true to our name. Fors popping painkillers, me and rust drinking like fish, and freak has a hooker on standby every match to snort coke off her ass when he needs an extra boost. GG's fellas.



Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on April 18, 2013, 11:58:07 PM
After I'm done with the matches, there's a complimentary mirror with a mysterious white powder on it waiting for me.  And some Scotch on the rocks to make the night go right.  ;>


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: yowza on April 19, 2013, 08:28:20 AM
8-1? 6-2? WAT?

why were we down a player both games? :(
One of your teammates quit near the end of each match. Started even.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: stan on April 22, 2013, 09:07:12 AM
Hey everyone just a reminder I will not be able to make this wednesdays match. I am working midnights this week and it just so happens that wed is my last night :(.

Reschedule for thurs night?!? ;)

Sorry.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 22, 2013, 11:43:30 AM
Reschedule for thurs night?!? ;)

I am okay with this. If you are serious I could check with my team. Would hate for your team to lose on account of a sub.

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: xgamma on April 22, 2013, 11:59:36 AM
Reschedule for thurs night?!? ;)

I am okay with this. If you are serious I could check with my team. Would hate for your team to lose on account of a sub.

Talgo

I'm ok with this if stan plays with a trackball on Thursday.  Really, I'm cool with Thursday.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 22, 2013, 01:05:17 PM
Unfortunately, Cartman is unable to play on Thursday. Sorry stan/rust


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Fors on April 22, 2013, 02:14:17 PM
Stan we will never be able to agree on a sub...soooooo I think it may be time to burn a vacation day and find a replacement at work :)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on April 22, 2013, 03:17:01 PM
I can do Thursday nights if need be.  Actually, I can do damn near any night, pretty open right now.  :>


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 22, 2013, 07:14:53 PM
I can do Thursday nights if need be.  Actually, I can do damn near any night, pretty open right now.  :>

must be nice to be a fucking loser and not have a job and live off whoever you do, fatfuck.

I'm fine with whatever day we can wait to where both sides have their original 4 players as us playing 3's was boring as fuck and I lost interest within the first minute of the game. 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: stan on April 23, 2013, 08:49:53 AM
Sorry fellas.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 23, 2013, 12:55:29 PM
I am available Sunday - Thursday after ~10EST with some notice. I outright refuse to play Fri/Sat nights.

If T4 can post their availability and I can confirm that the other members of CC can make it, I have no problem rescheduling. However, I _WILL NOT_ sub any player on my team so the other team doesn't have to. My team is available to play tomorrow night as planned.

If I have to bench a player to play 3v3, I guess we can do that. Please let me know ASAP.

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on April 23, 2013, 05:25:03 PM
Try and stay for the entire matches this time, guys.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 23, 2013, 08:39:13 PM
My hope is to play next Tuesday, 4/30 at the regular time of 10:15/10:30 est. Stan, that work for you? Fors, ex? This way the second round gets played as scheduled 5/1.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on April 23, 2013, 11:23:18 PM
Playoffs sheet:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoxUc5f4ovW-dGNhbjUyd09vVFV1XzkyelZ4aW5KNlE#gid=10 (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AoxUc5f4ovW-dGNhbjUyd09vVFV1XzkyelZ4aW5KNlE#gid=10)

Yes, that's fine btw.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: BoNkErS on April 23, 2013, 11:59:17 PM
Next week I may be out of town for work but not 100% sure. As for May 3rd - 8th I will be at St Jude's with my wife for her cancer checkup. Please find a suitable sub. Thanks


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: xgamma on April 24, 2013, 07:30:52 AM
So what I'm getting out of this is don't bother showing up tonight


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: stan on April 24, 2013, 08:53:00 AM
Filled out my availability for next week.

I am available all week, around 10pm est.
Also available anytime after tonight.

Shouldn't have any more issues with this cup and or summer cup as I start my new rotation next week which is DAYS ONLY. (thank god!)

Thanks guys


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Fors on April 24, 2013, 10:51:29 AM
wana make sure that it's deff. off for tonight right?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 24, 2013, 11:53:40 AM
please make up your minds as to whether or not we're gunna play tonight or not.  I'm not waiting til the last minute like we did last week to find out that we had to play 3's and didn't have a 4th suitable sub to fill gamma's spot and it was a complete joke.  I again like to stress that I get up at 5am for work everyday mon-sun(work is picking up so I'm now a mexican again and do 7 days instead of 3-5), so wasting even one minute on anything other than playing is irritating. 

Not to be a dick but we played last week without our best player and used a sub the 2nd game that wasn't anything near gamma's skill level, and got stomped to fucking hell and back so I'd like to return the favor tonight :P  (ilu stan)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 24, 2013, 12:20:49 PM
So what I'm getting out of this is don't bother showing up tonight

I know for a fact my whole team can make it tonight, therefor I would prefer to play tonight. It was extremely frustrating trying to play 3v3 last week, or with a sub (although I am thankful that B&J was willing to play with us).

Rust has suggested 04/30, if you and Rick-o are willing to play then, I can confirm with Cartman. Rust suggested it, ex said that was ok, and looks like stan is available (and Fors checked it on the good doc).

IDFC, I just want this to happen...

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: xgamma on April 24, 2013, 12:44:01 PM
Haha. Best player.   I think you unanimously hold that title, Rick.

I can't do next Tuesday, as indicated in the spreadsheet.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 24, 2013, 12:56:58 PM
Haha. Best player.   I think you unanimously hold that title, Rick.

I can't do next Tuesday, as indicated in the spreadsheet.


Then we play tonight.

Rust - Please try to find a sub, or we will have to play 3v3.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 24, 2013, 01:33:40 PM
Haha. Best player.   I think you unanimously hold that title, Rick.

I can't do next Tuesday, as indicated in the spreadsheet.


Then we play tonight.

Rust - Please try to find a sub, or we will have to play 3v3.

Looks like things are finally getting serious.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 24, 2013, 02:31:05 PM
Haha. Best player.   I think you unanimously hold that title, Rick.

I can't do next Tuesday, as indicated in the spreadsheet.


You've outscored me on every map so far sweety pie, so don't be a nerd :D It's the troofs.

and I fucking love this new Target.  +1930.  Please keep this one and get rid of retarded Target who giggles after every word he says on vent or says really bad jokes and is the only one who always laughs at em.  I like a manly man who stands his ground ;)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: T! on April 24, 2013, 02:55:11 PM
I'll sub for stan so I can talk on vent with rust.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: BoNkErS on April 24, 2013, 05:27:25 PM
Fu


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: yowza on April 24, 2013, 10:01:59 PM
Filled out my availability for next week.

I am available all week, around 10pm est.
Also available anytime after tonight.

Shouldn't have any more issues with this cup and or summer cup as I start my new rotation next week which is DAYS ONLY. (thank god!)

Thanks guys
Ditto for me as I am in Chicago for business now.
 Thx


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 24, 2013, 11:14:38 PM
Ok so CC and SA agreed to postpone until Monday, 4/29 at 10:15 pm EST. One best of three, no tears.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 24, 2013, 11:27:11 PM
TOL won against RC in what felt like two intense games.

Congrats to The Oompa Loompas.



Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on April 24, 2013, 11:28:42 PM
Ditto for me as I am in Chicago for business now.
 Thx

We won it for you YOWZA, it was hard, Rusty's team put up a fight.
But we just kept saying in vent "push through it man, just push through it for YOWZA"

PS. Can we please not play the final match until all 4 players from BOTH teams can be present? No 3's, no subs, just the original teams?
Even if final match doesn't get played for 3 weeks, please?

PPS.. I just said please to be nice. I'm not playing till we can play 4v4 with original lineups.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 24, 2013, 11:50:46 PM
Ditto for me as I am in Chicago for business now.
 Thx

We won it for you YOWZA, it was hard, Rusty's team put up a fight.
But we just kept saying in vent "push through it man, just push through it for YOWZA"

PS. Can we please not play the final match until all 4 players from BOTH teams can be present? No 3's, no subs, just the original teams?
Even if final match doesn't get played for 3 weeks, please?

PPS.. I just said please to be nice. I'm not playing till we can play 4v4 with original lineups.

that's reasonable to do for the championship matches.  for general matches waiting 3 weeks in between is a bit much imo.  Captains: the cup is in your logistical hands.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 25, 2013, 12:09:13 AM
I'm not good with logistics, but I'm pretty sure we're available most nights from here on out. That said, CC v SA scheduled for 4/29 at 10:15

I'd say people (that means SA, CC, and ToL) should plan to play the final on Wednesday, 5/1, two days after our rescheduled match at the regularly scheduled time, 10:15. Fair warning to CC, I'll prolly be hungover Monday, which means sober that evening. pH34r uS!

GLGL to all.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: yowza on April 25, 2013, 07:22:44 AM
Ditto for me as I am in Chicago for business now.
 Thx

We won it for you YOWZA, it was hard, Rusty's team put up a fight.
But we just kept saying in vent "push through it man, just push through it for YOWZA"

PS. Can we please not play the final match until all 4 players from BOTH teams can be present? No 3's, no subs, just the original teams?
Even if final match doesn't get played for 3 weeks, please?

PPS.. I just said please to be nice. I'm not playing till we can play 4v4 with original lineups.

ATA Boys!!!!
 Damn business needs getting in the way of my Q2.
 Thx Guys


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 26, 2013, 06:51:44 PM
DM+CTF stats for TOL vs RC game courtesy of suckmonkey.  Ignore the total score column, it's slightly off due to computing lfire scores, otherwise these stats are accurate.

Improved stats will be generated for the remaining play-off games as well as the championship matches.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 27, 2013, 07:04:50 PM
Play off section updated.  Play will be on server 1.  Maps as follows:

Quote
April 29:
10:20-10:35 EST 1   as2m7      SA Vs. CC   ---
10:40-10:55 EST 1   nxctf7      SA vs. CC   ---
if tie:
11-11:15      EST 1   marics_ctf21 SA vs. CC  ---
if tie:
11:20-11:30 EST 1  lfctf4
if tie:
11:30-11:40 EST 1  nxctf7

SA maps: nXctf7, marics_ctf21,as2m7
CC maps: lfctf4, nxctf7


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 28, 2013, 03:30:26 AM
How are the maps determined?

The way I understood it was that they had 3 maps and I had to pick one. They picked NXCTF7, AS2M7 & another. Of the 3 I picked NXCTF7. I had 2 map choices, which were NXCTF7 & LFCTF4. How did AS2M7 become a choice?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 28, 2013, 08:29:29 AM
I guess I wasn't very clear in the rules.

Low seed picks 2 maps for rounds 2/4(that's your team). (lfctf4/nxctf7) -high seed picks which of these maps is played round 2 and which is 4.

High seed picks 3 maps for rounds 1/3/5, that's SA.(nxctf7,marics21,as2m7) - low seed picks which of these maps is round 1,which is round 3, and which is 5.

Each team gets to order/pick the round for the enemies map choices.  I messaged rd-rust and he was pretty clear on nxctf7 over lfctf4.  That's why I kept asking you to order nxctf7/marics/as2m7.  You kept responding just saying that you picked nxctf7, so i gave up thinking you were trolling and decided to just ask some dick on irc to order the maps for rounds 1,3,5.   That dick(twat if you listen to the bot) had the preference caco then marics then tribute.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 28, 2013, 11:55:36 AM
Hm, ok, so what maps are we playing again?

Edit: Can we not just do top seed pick first map, opponent picks color, second seed picks and opponent picks color, then top seed again? This seems unnecessarily confusing.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 28, 2013, 02:34:12 PM
Hm, ok, so what maps are we playing again?

Edit: Can we not just do top seed pick first map, opponent picks color, second seed picks and opponent picks color, then top seed again? This seems unnecessarily confusing.

Deal. So what's first map?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 28, 2013, 02:57:59 PM
Variation/marics21


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 28, 2013, 05:31:43 PM
you guys would be awful to learn board games with.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on April 28, 2013, 05:45:21 PM
Rules are made to be broken, ask anyone behind bars.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 28, 2013, 07:33:57 PM
Don't hate us rusty.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 28, 2013, 09:54:52 PM
Hm, ok, so what maps are we playing again?

Edit: Can we not just do top seed pick first map, opponent picks color, second seed picks and opponent picks color, then top seed again? This seems unnecessarily confusing.

I'm on more drugs than any 4 people combined on this forum for my back and there was no confusion to me.  RUSTY'' was pretty clear but people don't like to read or follow the rules.  The better team picks three maps and the lower team picks two.  Each team decides the other teams map order out of those maps.  The better team gets rounds 1/3/5, the lower team gets 2/4.  (since there can be 5 maps total that can be played all together.) 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 29, 2013, 07:52:17 AM
I understand the rules but personally feel it's a disadvantage to have to pick three maps up front. I'd rather pick two, have him order them, and he pick two which I order. Also, the maps should be 'silent', we should submit our picks to rusty independently, not one of us say our two and the other pick theirs.

By me offering three maps, he has a better chance of being offered a map he wants to play anyway.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on April 29, 2013, 09:50:03 AM
I don't want to fuck anything up. I appreciate the time spent making/running this cup Rusty.

Just when you asked me to pick a map I picked LFCTF4. Later you told me I needed to select a second map, so I went with NXCTF7. Now it seems that NXCTF7 is my first option  :?

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 29, 2013, 10:22:47 AM
I understand the rules but personally feel it's a disadvantage to have to pick three maps up front. I'd rather pick two, have him order them, and he pick two which I order. Also, the maps should be 'silent', we should submit our picks to rusty independently, not one of us say our two and the other pick theirs.

By me offering three maps, he has a better chance of being offered a map he wants to play anyway.

good points.  But I think with games already played by TOL and RC and the match schedule for tomorrow it's a bit late however.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RD-Rust on April 29, 2013, 07:21:32 PM
I thought it was tonight!?


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 29, 2013, 08:34:14 PM
April 29:
10:20-10:35 EST 1   as2m7      SA Vs. CC   ---
10:40-10:55 EST 1   nxctf7      SA vs. CC   ---
if tie:
11-11:15      EST 1   marics_ctf21 SA vs. CC  ---
if tie:
11:20-11:30 EST 1  lfctf4
if tie:
11:30-11:40 EST 1  nxctf7

I'm sure RUSTY'' is just a day off in his head.  He's thinking Tuesday instead of Monday.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on April 30, 2013, 10:50:30 AM
Fors and the Substance Abusers were victorious last night against Carrying Cartman.   stats will be in a day or two.  screenshots below.   


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Golgo13 on April 30, 2013, 01:54:40 PM
Let's settle this insulting business with a Duel.  

mano a mano

Rusty V Worm

To make it fair, the duel should Be on Golgo's server.

the duel you refused to play on? i accepted yours however. tsk tsk


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 30, 2013, 06:47:15 PM
Fors and the Substance Abusers were victorious last night against Carrying Cartman.   stats will be in a day or two.  screenshots below.   

fucking cartman coulda done better, I blame him for our loss.  thanks FATASS.  (jk) gg's negros and congratulations goes to ex for playing the game of his fucking life on caco.  Find it funny that after that game we played 3on2's against yoda/T vs me/ex/beav and we were BARELY winning.  fucking ex can play his dick off in that match but sucks ass anytime he plays on my team.  I hope you choke on whatever you eat next.  <3


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on April 30, 2013, 06:50:34 PM
Let's settle this insulting business with a Duel.  

mano a mano

Rusty V Worm

To make it fair, the duel should Be on Golgo's server.

the duel you refused to play on? i accepted yours however. tsk tsk

why bother even posting here.  You're a complete idiot that needs to lob himself in front of a god damn semi.  Nobody likes you and that's not an accomplishment, although I know the negative attention you receive is better than none so you'll take it while jumping up and down that people are paying you any attention.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Targe+ on May 01, 2013, 11:36:37 AM
To CC Carrying Cartman:

Cartman - Thanks for showing up to all the games. You tried your best and did what was asked of you. What more could a captain ask for? Sorry for the 2v2's and 3v3's, I know they are not your strong point, but thanks for your patience.

Gamma - Thanks for showing up for most the games, and letting me know when you couldn't. Much appreciated. Unfortunately we were missing some key members from the "Dream Team" and didn't have enough to succeed this time around.

Rick - Thanks for filling in for Barton. You showed up for most of our scheduled matches, and stayed till the end of a couple too. I know we had some frustrating loses, but thanks for sticking it out.

Was a pretty good season, thanks for making it mostly fun :)

Talgo


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: xgamma on May 01, 2013, 12:39:21 PM
thanks for captaining target.  you rock


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: BoNkErS on May 01, 2013, 08:00:11 PM
thanks for captaining target.  you rock

Kiss ass
:)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: alka on May 02, 2013, 08:03:01 AM
Thanks to RUSTY for running the cup, good job!

Thanks to TOL for finally giving me a Cup victory. This was personally my 3rd appearance in a "final match" and I finally have it, VICTORY!

When are signups for the next Cup Rusty?


Title: Statistics playoff game between SA and CC
Post by: RUSTY``` on May 02, 2013, 01:03:37 PM
Playoff stats Carrying Cartman vs Fors and the Substance Abusers


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on May 02, 2013, 01:08:03 PM
Spring Cup Winners:
The Oompa Loompas: Alka,Bonkers,Link,Yowza

playoffs/finals results:
--------------------------------------------------------------

 -- PLAY-OFFS --  Seed1vSeed4 Seed2vSeed3 TOLvsRC  SAvsCC
April 24
10:20-10:35 EST 1   lfctf10         TOL vs. RC   9-5
10:35-10:50 EST 1   mactf06       TOL vs. RC  7-4

April 29:
10:20-10:35 EST 1   as2m7      SA Vs. CC   7-4
10:40-10:55 EST 1   nxctf7      SA vs. CC   6-2

---------------------------------------------------------------
May 1 ---Finals---

10:15-10:30 EST 1   lfctf10            TOL vs.SA   10-12
10:35-10:50 EST 1   marics_ctf21     TOL vs.SA   7-2
Tie-Breaker:
10:55-11:10 EST 1   b6ctf             TOL vs.SA   7-4

--------------------------------------------------------------

TOL v SA statistics attached.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on May 02, 2013, 01:08:31 PM
Thanks for playing everyone :)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ex on May 02, 2013, 03:07:20 PM
Incorrect score on the tiebreaker.  Was 7-4 I believe.  Not sure on the other ones though.

GGs to all, btw.  So...when's the next one?   :wink:


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: RUSTY``` on May 02, 2013, 03:11:07 PM
hrm, stats missed all your teams caps.


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Bones on May 02, 2013, 05:35:42 PM
I have demos and screenshots. 
1st game on Lush was Sa 12 to 10 Tol.
2nd game on Marics was Tol 7 to 2 Sa
3rd game on Outpost was Tol 7 to 4 Sa.

Very good games and I am glad I got to see them all.  :) 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: roffles on May 02, 2013, 06:56:03 PM
Thanks for doing a great job running this RUSTY''.  And thanks for all the time you put into it. 

gj and grats to my gf bonkers and ToL for their win.

and thanks target for putting up with me, even though you're a jackass.  gj cartman for doing nothing every game(jk) and fu gamma for outscoring me and making me look bad a few games ;)


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: yowza on May 03, 2013, 08:15:45 AM
Thanks for playing everyone :)
Thanks again Rusty and GJ. You gave us all some fun times.
 


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: Fors on May 03, 2013, 10:03:32 AM
it was very enjoyable, thanks Rusty!!!!


Title: Re: Spring Cup -- TEAMS -- STANDINGS -- SCHEDULE -- RULES --
Post by: ZomBiE on June 09, 2013, 09:49:45 AM
wtb demos =)